A revision petition under Sections 438 and 528 BNSS seeking setting aside an ASJ's order relating to FIR No. 96/2009 was withdrawn by the petitioner to cure defects. The High Court granted leave and liberty to file afresh and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
VISHAL KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anmol Sharma, Adv.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State and Ms. Mansi Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
CRL.M.A. 9919/2025(exemption)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:29:39
AMIT SHARMA, J
APRIL 2, 2025/ kr/sc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:29:39
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishal Kumar
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
