Durgesh Kumar v. State (National Capital Territory of Delhi) & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the complainant had expired and the petitioner had been acquitted.
Petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the complainant had expired and the petitioner had been acquitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
Through: Mr. Karan Sharma and Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Adv. and Mr. Ishaan Jain, Advs.
versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 04.12.2025
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
DECEMBER 4, 2025/lks/sk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 12:17:31
Durgesh Kumar
State (National Capital Territory of Delhi)
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court