Meghna Khanna & Anr. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed a criminal petition for non-prosecution as no representative appeared even after a second call to proceed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
$~21
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 925/2019 & CRL.M.A. 3697/2019
MEGHNA KHANNA & ANR.
.....Petitioners
Through: None
versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State along with Gajender. Mr. Inderdeep Singh, Advocate for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 17.02.2025
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners even on second call. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further.
Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meghna Khanna
- respondent
State
Coram
Chandra Dhar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court