The High Court of Delhi dismissed a petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, who stated it had become infructuous after the petitioner's surrender. The hearing date was subsequently cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
RAVI GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya and Mr. Rishabh Malhotra, Advs.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 06.05.2025
Mr. Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has already surrendered and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
He seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. The statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record and the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The date earlier fixed stands cancelled.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MAY 6, 2025 Sky/ia
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2025 at 16:01:16
Ravi Gupta
State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
