Tanveer v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant produced from custody stated he has completed his substantive and default sentence. Consequently, the Court disposed of the criminal appeal as not pressed against him.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as not pressed.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 909/2016 TANVEER .....Appellant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Ms. Vipakshi Rana and Mr. Prashant, Advs.
| versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| STATE | .....Respondent | |
| Through: | Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with | |
| SI K.P. Singh, P.S. New Ashok | ||
| Nagar, Mr. Pramod Kumar Gupta Superintendent and Sunny, Asstt. |
||
| Superintendent Tihar Jail |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
% 08.10.2025
- In pursuance of the last order, wherein an explanation was sought as to why nominal roll was not received even on 22.09.2025 despite the matter being listed twice, i.e. on 18.09.2025 and 19.09.2025. Today, Mr. Pramod Kumar Gupta is present in Court and submits that the said orders were received only on 04.10.2025. Let the DG (Prisons) look into the same.
- Copy of this order be placed before the DG (Prisons), Tihar by the Jail Superintendent.
- Learned APP for the State has handed over the nominal roll of the appellant, which is taken on record. As per the same, the appellant is stated to be involved in 3 other cases, however, in the present case he has
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tanveer
- respondent
State
Coram
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court