Disposed
Neelam Chopra & Anr. v. State & Ors.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./88/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition having been filed by persons who had already expired, it is disposed of as abated with no further orders.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~20
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
+ CRL.M.C. 88/2008
¶4
NEELAM CHOPRA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Kamal, PS Tughlak Road. Mr. Sansar and Mr. Vinay, Advocates for R-3 along with R-3 in person.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 10.09.2025
¶8
- The verification report has been handed over in the Court and is taken on record.
¶9
- The verification report shows that the petitioners have already expired.
¶10
- In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of as abated.
¶11
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Neelam Chopra & Anr
- respondent
State & Ors
Coram
AI extract
Amit Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court