Disposed¶24

Rupali Mehdwar & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC24 Nov 2025CRL.M.C./8381/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of cross FIRs No. 277/2022 (Ss. 323/341/427/506/34 IPC) and No. 276/2022 (Ss. 323/341/506/34), P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi; petitions under Section 528 BNSS 2023 by Hemraj & Ors. and Rupali Mehdwar & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi; family dispute settled by MOU dated 14.11.2025 after fight of 12.06.2022; complainants consented in Court; no legal impediment; FIRs and consequential proceedings quashed; petitions disposed of (Neena Bansal Krishna, J., 24.11.2025).

What did the court decide?

Quashing of cross FIRs No. 277/2022 and No. 276/2022 registered at P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom; petitions disposed of along with pending applications ¶24

Rupali Mehdwar & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~55 & 70

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 8332/2025, CRL.M.A. 34778/2025

¶3

HEMRAJ & ORS.

¶4

.....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Yogesh Singh, Advocate. versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

¶7

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State.

¶8

¶9

- CRL.M.C. 8381/2025

¶10

RUPALI MEHDWAR & ANR.

¶11

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shaurya Sethi, Advocate. versus

¶12

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

¶13

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State.

¶14

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

% 24.11.2025 8. The petitioners vide the present petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seek quashing of cross FIRs No. 277/2022 under Section 323/341/427/506/34 IPC and 276/2022 registered under Sections 323/341/506/34, registered at P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi and all proceeding emanating therefrom in view of the Settlement arrived at between the parties.

¶17

A request for quashing of the FIR has been made on account of the

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2025 at 14:57:56

¶20

Settlement inter se the parties. It is stated that the parties are related to each other and are families of two brothers, who had a fight on 12.06.2022. It is stated that the parties have amicably settled all their disputes. The parties have entered into MOU dated 14.11.2025 and have amicably settled all their disputes. The parties endorse the Settlement and shall remain bound by the terms of Settlement.

¶21

The parties are present before this Court in person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned.

¶22

Today, the complainants who are present in Court state that they have no objection if the FIR is quashed. 12. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIRs in question.

¶23

Accordingly cross FIRs No. 277/2022 under Section 323/341/427/506/34 IPC and 276/2022 registered under Sections 323/341/506/34 respectively, registered at P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶24

The petitions stand disposed of along with pending Application(s).

¶25

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶26

NOVEMBER 24, 2025/va

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2025 at 14:57:56

Rupali Mehdwar & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupali Mehdwar & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil Kumaria Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Another

Vijay Kumar & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Joginder Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Govt of NCT and Anr.

Rohit Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Arvind Kumar Vs C B I

Indu Kumar Vs Central Bureau of Investigation