Allowed¶24

Aditya Giri v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Quashing of FIR – settlement between parties

Delhi HC24 Nov 2025CRL.M.C./8351/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.M.C. 8351/2025, Aditya Giri v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr., Delhi High Court, decided 24.11.2025 by Vikas Mahajan, J. — quashing of FIR on settlement; Section 528 BNSS (482 Cr.P.C.); offences under Sections 354/354(B)/354(D)/323/451/506/509 IPC; P.S. GTB Enclave; Memorandum of Understanding dated 13.11.2025; complainant's no-objection.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No. 0026/2021 under Sections 354/354(B)/354(D)/323/451/506/509 IPC registered at P.S. GTB Enclave, Delhi, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom. ¶24

Aditya Giri Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~74

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 8351/2025

¶4

ADITYA GIRI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Anshul Kumar, Mr. Manish Mishra, Ms. Tanya Gupta & Mr. Anand, Advs. alongwith petitioner in person

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State with SI Rupa PS GTB Enclave. R-2/complainant in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 24.11.2025

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (482 Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of FIR No. 0026/2021 under Sections 354/354(B)/354(D)/323/451/506/509 IPC registered at P.S. GTB Enclave, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement.

¶13

Issue notice.

¶14

Ms. Richa Dhawan, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State accepts notice.

¶15

The petitioner and respondent No. 2 are stated to be known to each other and they are present in Court and they have been identified by their respective counsels and by IO- SI Rupa PS GTB Enclave

¶16

During pendency of the proceedings they arrived at a settlement, terms whereof were reduced in writing in the form of Memorandum of

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/12/2025 at 14:02:33

¶19

Understanding dated 13.11.2025, copy of which is annexed as Annexure P-2 to the present petition.

¶20

It has been recorded in the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes and differences and respondent No.2 and they shall cooperate with each other in quashing of the aforesaid FIR.

¶21

On a query posed by this Court, the respondent no.2, who is present in court, states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.

¶22

In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them.

¶23

It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed.

¶24

Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No. 0026/2021 under Sections 354/354(B)/354(D)/323/451/506/509 IPC registered at P.S. GTB Enclave, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is quashed.

¶25

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶26

Order be uploaded on the website of this court

¶27

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶28

NOVEMBER 24, 2025/ sk

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/12/2025 at 14:02:33

Aditya Giri v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditya Giri v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sarla Taneja Vs Delhi Development Authority

Imran @ Murgi Chor Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ikramuddin Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Munesh Kausik Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Aman Agarwal and Ors. Vs Raj Bala

Aman Agarwal and Ors. Vs Raj Bala