Sachin Kumar Sharma & Anr. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

1. The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (earlier Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) has been filed on behalf of the petitioners praying for the quashing of FIR No. 0317/2018, registered at Police Station Shahdara, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”).

¶13

2. The brief facts concerning the present dispute are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 29.04.2013, according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, due to some temperamental differences between them, shortly after their marriage, they started living separately.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2025 at 12:33:04

¶16

3. Despite efforts of reconciliation, both the parties could not settle their differences, pursuant to which respondent no. 2 got FIR no. 0317/2018 registered.

¶17

4. However, at this stage, with the intervention of family members and relatives, both the parties have entered a settlement on 03.07.2025. The terms and conditions of the said settlement are mentioned in the Memorandum of Understanding dated 03.07.2025 (hereinafter “MOU”) which is annexed as “Annexure P-3” to the petition. In pursuance of the said settlement, the parties have jointly agreed that they shall move for divorce under Section 13B (1) and under Section 13B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and accordingly, a divorce decree order dated 20.11.2025, which is handed over by learned counsel for the petitioner to this Court, was passed by the Court concerned. The divorce decree order dated 20.11.2025 be taken on record.

¶18

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that respondent no. 2 has settled all her claims in respect of her dowry articles, stridhan , marriage expenses, jewelleries, gift items and claims of past, present and future maintenance and permanent alimony with the petitioners and all disputes of any nature whatsoever for a sum of ₹23,00,000/-.

¶19

6. At this juncture, the respondent no. 2 appearing in person submits that she has received the entire amount as per the terms of the MOU. 7. It is, thus, prayed that the instant FIR be quashed on the basis of MOU.

¶20

8. Learned APP for the State, who appears on advance notice, accepts notice and submits that there is no opposition to the prayer made on behalf

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2025 at 12:33:04

¶23

of the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR in question in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

¶24

9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 10. The petitioners are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer, Police Station Shahdara, Shahdara District, Delhi. Respondent no. 2 is also present in the Court and has been identified by her counsel and the concerned Investigating Officer. 11. The instant criminal proceedings concern non-compoundable offences that are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on society, especially considering that there is a settlement/compromise between the victim and the accused.

¶25

12. In such cases, it is settled law that High Court is also required to consider the conduct and antecedents of the accused in order to ascertain that the settlement has been entered into by her own free will and has not been imposed upon her by the petitioners or any person related to them. 13. In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. (2019) 5 SCC 688 , the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the powers conferred under Section 482 of the CrPC/Section 528 of the BNSS, can be exercised by the Courts to quash criminal proceedings featuring noncompoundable offences, when the matter arises out of matrimonial or family disputes. Moreover, it is pertinent to satisfy the Court that the said noncompoundable offences are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on society.

¶26

14. Furthermore, it was observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramgopal and Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh 2021 INSC 568 , that the extraordinary power enjoined upon the High Courts under

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2025 at 12:33:04

¶29

Section 482 of the CrPC/Section 528 of the BNSS can be invoked even when such a case falls within the ambit of non-compoundable offences, given that the Court is satisfied that the nature of the offence does not impact the conscience of society, and that the compromise between the parties is voluntary and amicable.

¶30

15. In the present case, the complainant/respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise and settled the entirety of disputes with the petitioners amicably and of her own free will, without any pressure or coercion. There is also no allegation from respondent no. 2 that the conduct and antecedents of petitioners have been bad towards her after entering into this compromise. As per the settlement agreement, respondent no. 2 has received the entire settled amount. Further, she submits that she has no objection to the present FIR being quashed. 16. Therefore, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, FIR No. 0317/2018, registered at Police Station Shahdara, Shahdara District, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed qua the present petitioners.

¶31

17. Children from the wedlock, if any, are free to assert their rights in accordance with law. 18. The petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶32

AJAY DIGPAUL, J

¶33

DECEMBER 11, 2025 gs/dd

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2025 at 12:33:04

Sachin Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Yameen Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Ankit Nayyar & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Mohd Tanvir Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Pawan Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Dildar Ahamad Khan Vs State Govt of NCT of Dlehi and Ors.

Sanjeev Singhal Vs Union of India & Anr.