Disposed
Suraj @ Sunny v. State
Delhi HCCRL.A./783/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal by a convict who had already served both substantive and default sentences; the appellant chose not to press the appeal on merits, and it was disposed of as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~22
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 783/2017
¶4
- SURAJ @ SUNNY
¶5
- .....Appellant
¶6
- Through: Mr. Vikas Padora and Mr. Aakash Kumar, Advocates
¶7
- versus
¶8
STATE
¶9
- .....Respondent
¶10
- Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with SI Arvind Verma
¶11
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
¶12
- % 10.11.2025
¶13
- The appellant has been produced through VC from Central Jail-01, Tihar, by ASI Dhamesh Kumar. The nominal roll of the appellant is on record which reflects that although the appellant in the present case has already undergone both the substantive and default sentences, he is presently in custody in some other case.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Suraj @ Sunny
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court