Allowed¶28

Ashwani Singh & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC3 Feb 2025CRL.M.C./7654/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court CRL.M.C. 7654/2024; Vikas Mahajan J; 03.02.2025; Section 482 Cr. P.C 1973 quashing on settlement; FIR No. 08/2023 Sections 420 IPC cheating/job scam Rs. 1 lakh; PS Cyber Police Station North East Delhi; Memorandum of Understanding/Compromise Deed 24.04.2024 Annexure-P3; full and final settlement; complainant no objection in person; Parbatbhai Aahir vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 paras 16.7-16.9 applied; chances of conviction bleak; exercise in futility; petition allowed FIR quashed.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 08/2023 under Sections 420 IPC registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, North East, Delhi, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, quashed; petition stands disposed of in the above terms. ¶28

Ashwani Singh & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~68

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 7654/2024 & Crl. M.A. 29200/2024

¶4

ASHWANI SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Satish Chandra, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with SI Ankur, PS Cyber Police Station, North-East, Delhi Mr. Bhagwan Sahu, Advocate for R-3 in person.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶9

O R D E R % 03.02.2025

¶10

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 08/2023 under Sections 420 IPC registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, North East, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement.

¶11

Notice was already issued vide order dated 26.09.2024.

¶12

The petitioners, as well as, respondent no.3/complainant are present in the Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel, as well as, by the Investigating Officer/SI Ankur, Police Station Cyber Police Station, North-East, Delhi.

¶13

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners had cheated the

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:44:19

¶16

respondent no. 3 for an amount of Rs. 1 lakh on the pretext that they will arrange a job for him. The incident led to the registration of the aforesaid FIR.

¶17

During the pendency of proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement, terms whereof have been reduced into writing in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding/Compromise Deed dated 24.04.2024, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure-P3 to the present petition.

¶18

It is recorded in the settlement that the parties have arrived at a settlement voluntarily, without any pressure or coercion. The respondent no. 3 has been paid a sum of Rs. 1 lakh by the petitioners in full and final settlement of all his claim.

¶19

Respondent no. 3, who is present in Court affirms the factum of settlement between him and the petitioners, acknowledges the receipt of the settlement amount of Rs. 1 lakh. He further submits that he does not wish to prosecute the criminal proceedings in the aforesaid FIR and also states that he has no objections in case the aforesaid FIR is quashed.

¶20

In Parbatbhai Aahir vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 , the Supreme Court laid down as under:-

¶21

“...16.7. As distinguished from serious offences, there may be criminal cases which have an overwhelming or predominant element of a civil dispute. They stand on a distinct footing insofar as the exercise of the inherent power to quash is concerned.

¶22

16.8. Criminal cases involving offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute.

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:44:19

¶25

16.9. In such a case, the High Court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice; and”...

¶26

In view of the settlement between the parties, the ultimate chances of conviction in the case are bleak, therefore, continuation of criminal proceedings will not serve any useful purpose and it will be an exercise in futility.

¶27

It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed.

¶28

Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No. 08/2023 under Sections 420 IPC registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, North East, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is quashed.

¶29

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶30

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶31

FEBRUARY 3, 2025 ‘ rs’

¶32

This is a digitally signed order.

¶33

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:44:19

Ashwani Singh & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwani Singh & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Kumar Vs the State and Another

Sunil Chauhan Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Saksham Kathuria & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Kamal Dev and Ors. Vs State Gnctd and Anr.

Gaurav Dhaka & Anr. Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi through Sho, P.S. Dwarka North, Delhi. & Anr.

Abhay Kumar Chaubey Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr.