Dismissed¶18

Mohd Muddaser@ Mohd Kaish v. the State and Ors. .

Delhi HC22 Jan 2025CRL.M.C./6988/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, Swarana Kanta Sharma J., 22.01.2025: four CRL.M.C. petitions (6988/2022, 7103/2022, 105/2023, 259/2023) dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner absence despite calls; interim relief of 21.12.2022 previously subject to withdrawal on non-appearance; no substantive issues framed, no statutes or precedents cited; useful only as authority for practice-point that unattended petitions are struck off and interim protection lapses.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; all petitions dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶18

Mohd Muddaser@ Mohd Kaish Vs the State and Ors. . — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~32 to 35

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6988/2022 MOHD MUDDASER@ MOHD KAISH .....Petitioner Through: None versus THE STATE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Madan Prasad (33) + CRL.M.C. 7103/2022 MOHAMMAD AZHAR .....Petitioner Through: None versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Madan Prasad (34) + CRL.M.C. 105/2023 MD SHAUKAT .....Petitioner Through: None versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Madan Prasad

¶3

This is a digitally signed order.

¶4

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 11:58:23

¶5

(35)

¶6

- CRL.M.C. 259/2023

¶7

MD MOAZZAM SIDDIQUI .....Petitioner Through: None

¶8

versus

¶9

THE STATE AND ORS NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

¶10

Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Madan Prasad

¶11

CORAM:

¶12

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

% 22.01.2025

¶15

No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

¶16

On the last date of hearing, it was clarified that in case, the petitioners will not appear, the interim relief which was granted vide order dated 21.12.2022 will be withdrawn.

¶17

Since, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite calls, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter any further.

¶18

Accordingly, the present petitions stand dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶19

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶20

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J

¶21

JANUARY 22, 2025/ns

¶22

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 11:58:23

Mohd Muddaser@ Mohd Kaish v. the State and Ors. .

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Muddaser@ Mohd Kaish v. the State and Ors. .

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pravesh Mann@ Sagar Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Inamul Sheikh Vs State through SHO Ps Jamia Nagar

Mukesh Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi through Its Chief Secretary

Rakesh Verma Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Arun Kumar Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Shiv @ Bhola Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi