Dismissed¶19

Sunita v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC24 Jan 2025CRL.M.C./6684/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.M.C. 6684/2022; SUNITA v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.; High Court of Delhi; Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.; order dated 24.01.2025; execution petitions; expeditious disposal; arrears of more than ₹20 lakhs (≈Rs. 20,00,000); respondent no. 2 proceeded ex parte after non-appearance; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition; digitally signed order downloaded from DHC server on 27/01/2025.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition in case need so arises; learned Trial Court requested to expedite the pending execution petitions and pass appropriate orders at the earliest. ¶19

Sunita Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 6684/2022

¶4

SUNITA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. M.K. Perwez, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 24.01.2025

¶12

On 16.07.2024, the learned Predecessor Bench had observed that if there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 2, on the next date of hearing, this Court shall proceed to hear the matter in the absence of respondent no. 2.

¶13

No one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2 even today, thus this Court proceeds to hear the matter.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the arrear of more than ₹20 lakhs is pending which the respondent no. 2 was required to pay to the petitioner herein. The learned counsel further requests that this Court may issue directions to the learned Trial Court that with whom the execution petitions are pending, to decide the matter expeditiously.

¶15

The learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the proceedings and pass appropriate order in the execution petitions, at the earliest.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 11:58:27

¶18

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file fresh petition, in case need so arises.

¶19

Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

¶20

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶21

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J

¶22

JANUARY 24, 2025/zp

¶23

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 11:58:27

Sunita v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niyamat Khan Vs the State (Govt.of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Sh Sajid Vs State through SHO Bhalaswa Dairy

Satyender Singh Yadav Vs State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Bhagwan Malik @ Rajesh @ Babu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Bavinder Malhotra and Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sh Deepesh Khanna Vs Baby Harshita Khanna & Anr.