Allowed

Charu Relhan & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC2 Jul 2025CRL.M.C./620/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order allows petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIRs arising from a minor neighborhood dispute over parking. Court finds no useful purpose in continuing proceedings after amicable settlement and quashes FIR and connected operations.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No.0509/2019 and all proceedings thereby initiated. Petition and application disposed of.

Charu Relhan & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~35

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 620/2025

¶4

CHARU RELHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Dipendra Kuamr Singh and Mr. Atul Agarwal, Advocates with Petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Satish Kumar, PS: Model Town and ASI Ompal Singh, PS: Mukherjee Nagar.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 02.07.2025

¶12

CRL.M.A. 2987/2025

¶13

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶14

2. The Application stands disposed of.

¶15

CRL.M.C. 620/2025

¶16

3. Petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No.0509/2019 under Sections 323/341/34 IPC registered at PS: Model Town, in terms of Compromise Deed dated 20.11.2024.

¶17

4. Issue notice.

¶18

5. Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

¶19

6. It is submitted that the parties are neighbours and a small quarrel took place on the issue of parking. With the intervention of relatives, friends & well-wishers, the matter has been amicably settled in terms of Compromise Deed dated 20.11.2024. It is further submitted that a cross-FIR No.509/2019

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2025 at 12:05:13

¶21

under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC had also been registered, which also has been agreed to be quashed by the parties.

¶22

7. The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Settlement Deed dated 20.11.2024 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR.

¶23

8. The present Petition has been signed by the Petitioners and is supported by their Affidavits. The parties have reaffirmed the terms of the settlement arrived at vide Settlement Deed dated 20.11.2024 and they also submit that the said Settlement has been arrived at between the parties, without any pressure and coercion.

¶24

9. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is related to friends cum neighbours, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶25

10. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶26

11. Accordingly, FIR No.0509/2019 under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC registered at PS: Model Town and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶27

12. Petition along with pending Application, is disposed of accordingly.

¶28

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

¶29

JULY 2, 2025/ R

¶30

Charu Relhan & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Charu Relhan & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashreen Verma and Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Usman & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ankur Multania & Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

Narender Gulia & Ors. Vs the State N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.

Nadeem and Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Navneet Singh & Ors. Vs the State N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.