Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR after settling with respondents 2 to 4, but the State objected citing other victims; counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to reapply upon settling with all victims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
Through: Ms. Vishakha, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate for R-2 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R
% 16.09.2025
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 /as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:09:27
Rajeev Gupta
The State of NCT of Delhi
Respondents 2 to 4
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
