Writ petition seeking four weeks' parole to attend a nephew's marriage; the event had already occurred, rendering the request infructuous and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
VINOD CHAUHAN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocate.
versus
STATE GOVT. OFNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate. SI Meeta, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 10.03.2025
SANJEEV NARULA, J
MARCH 10, 2025/ as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:12:59
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod Chauhan
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
