Dismissed

Sharad Sharma v. the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Jan 2025CRL.M.C./5414/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings was withdrawn by the petitioner, who appeared against the framing of charges. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but directed the Trial Court to ensure a speedy trial within one year.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; direction to lower court for trial within one year.

Sharad Sharma Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~34

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 5414/2023 & CRL.M.A. 20553/2023 (stay)

¶4

SHARAD SHARMA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the STate with SI Seema, P.S. Dwarka South and SI Jyoti, P.S. Dwarka Sec. 23.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 08.01.2025

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the following prayers:

¶14

“(i) Quash F.I.R. No. 316/2021 U/s 376/506 IPC Ps: Dwarka South, Delhi along with Charge-Sheet & Supplementary Charge-Sheet U/s 376/506/323 IPC and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, presently pending in the Court of Ms. Shama Gupta, Ld. ASJ (S/W), Dwarka, Delhi in S.C. No. 165/2022 titled as “State Vs. Sharad Sharma” (NDOH: 19.09.2023), in the interest of justice. (ii) Pass any other or further order deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favor of the Petitioner, in the interest of justice.”

¶15

During the course of hearing, it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that prior to the filing of the present petition, charges qua the present Petitioner have been framed by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 01.03.2023 and the same has not been challenged by the Petitioner.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:37:03

¶17

In view of the above, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition seeking prayer for an expeditious trial.

¶18

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn thereof.

¶19

It is made clear that no arguments have been addressed on the merits of the present case.

¶20

The learned Trial Court is directed to ensure that the trial is conducted as expeditiously as possible without giving any undue adjournment to any other parties, within the period of 1 year from today.

¶21

The Petition stands disposed of.

¶22

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶23

Order be communicated to the learned Trial Court the necessary information and compliance.

¶24

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶25

JANUARY 08, 2025/ kr

¶26

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶27

Sharad Sharma v. the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharad Sharma v. the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Sharma Vs C B I

Ajay Bali Vs C.B.I.

Yashovardhan Birla Vs M/S Jads Services Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Lucky Vs State NCT of Delhi

Dharamveer Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Kamruddin Vs State NCT of Delhi