Writ petition seeking protection; petitioners stated protection was already received from the concerned SHO, rendering the petition infructuous. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS SHO POLICE STATION BHAJANPURA & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Y.R. Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Adv. with SI Akash and PSI Naveen Yadav, PS Bhajanpura and SI Ashok Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R
% 24.04.2025
SHALINDER KAUR, J
APRIL 24, 2025 /ss/frk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/05/2025 at 16:21:24
Alim Alam & Ors.
State NCT of Delhi through its SHO Police Station Bhajanpura
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
