The applicants filed bail applications and common applications. Following arguments, the applicants sought liberty to withdraw the petitions, which was granted. Consequently, the petitions stood dismissed as withdrawn and pending matters were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11 to 13
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Ms. Divya Yadav and Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advocates. Insp. Kishore Kumar, PS Vasant Kunj North. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for complainant.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/11/2025 at 12:35:45
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ANR
& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Ms. Divya Yadav and Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advocates. Insp. Kishore Kumar, PS Vasant Kunj North. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R
% 13.11.2025
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
NOVEMBER 13, 2025 DU
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/11/2025 at 12:35:45
Rajalakshmi
Sushil Raman
Smt. Rajalakshmi Anr
State NCT of Delhi
State of NCT of Delhi
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
