Revision petition under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging a summoning order was dismissed in default for non-prosecution; the petitioner did not appear on multiple hearing dates and had not effected service of notice on the respondent despite several opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
NISHANT SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: None. versus
SHUBHRA SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 23.05.2025
following prayers: -
“a) allow the Revision Petition setting aside the impugned summoning-Order dated 25.04.2022 passed in terms of order dated 18.04.2022 by the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate-NorthWest/Rohini, Delhi 1n CT. Case 25641/2016; AND b) Call for the Trial Court Records of CT. Case 25641/2016 subjudice before the Ld. Court of Metropolitan Magistrate-03 (North West) Rohini courts, Delhi in CT. Case 25641/2016.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2025 at 11:38:10
prosecution and disposed of accordingly along with all pending applications, if any.
AMIT SHARMA, J
MAY 23, 2025/ kr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2025 at 11:38:10
2 provisions across 1 enactments
NISHANT SHARMA
SHUBHRA SHARMA
AMIT SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
