State sought leave to appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against acquittal in a Section 307 IPC case involving burn injuries to a mother-in-law. The Trial Court had found two possible views given the strained relationship and unsupportive FSL report. The High Court declined to grant leave and disposed of the petition with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Mr. Lalit Luthra Adv. (M: 9910645959) with Insp Vijay Kumar, PS Mandawalu.
versus
SABANA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Yogendra Mishra, Adv. along with Respondent in person.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
CRL.M.A. 20150/2022 & CRL.L.P. 471/2022
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:21:44
than Sabana present at the place of the incident and second, that Najma did suffer burns but she falsely implicated her daughter-in-law Sabana due to their strained relationship. ”
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
DHARMESH SHARMA, J
JANUARY 13, 2025/ gunn/bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:21:44
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the State against the acquittal of the Respondent under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State
Sabana
Prathiba M. Singh
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
