Dismissed¶19

Mohd Asim v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC15 Jul 2025CRL.M.C./4605/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing petition; FIR No. 245/2025; PS Lajpat Nagar; Section 64(1)/351(3) BNS; Mohd Asim; State of NCT of Delhi; prosecutrix-signed petition; settlement deed dated 06.07.2025; settlement between prosecutrix and father of accused; rape allegations; blackmailing on photographs; petition dismissed as withdrawn; Girish Kathpalia J.; Delhi High Court; 15.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition; dismissed as withdrawn without any adjudication on merits and without quashing of the FIR. ¶19

Mohd Asim Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~73

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 4605/2025, CRL.M.A. 20007/2025 & CRL.M.A. 20008/2025

¶4

MOHD ASIM .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Jatin Rajput, Mr. Sandeep Kumar and Mr. Varun Panwar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Kavita, PS Lajpat Nagar. Complainant in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 15.07.2025

¶12

[ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

¶13

Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 245/2025 of PS Lajpat Nagar for offences under Section 64(1)/351(3) of BNS.

¶14

The present petition is signed not by the accused but by the prosecutrix. It is claimed in the petition that prosecutrix and the accused compromised the disputes by way of settlement deed dated 06.07.2025. But even the alleged settlement deed is between the prosecutrix and father of the accused. The petitioner named in the petition is the accused but the signatures in the petition are stated to be of the prosecutrix. In other words, the accused is nowhere in this picture.

¶15

The allegations in the subject FIR are quite serious as multiple

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2025 at 12:32:49

¶18

incidents of rape have been alleged by the prosecutrix, followed by blackmailing on the basis of photographs.

¶19

After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶20

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶21

JULY 15, 2025/ DR

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2025 at 12:32:49

Mohd Asim v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Asim v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas @ Vicky @ Ponga Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Adesh Kumar & Anr. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Kamal Kumar Vs State

Samir @ Azhar Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Amit Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Sanjay @ Kala Vs the State NCT of Delhi