Allowed¶10

State v. Mamta Sehgal & Ors.

Delhi HC22 Apr 2025CRL.L.P./43/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: leave to appeal; acquittal challenged; State petition; CRL.L.P. 43/2021; CRL.A./2025 (to be numbered); FIR No. 203/2016; Police Station Mianwali Nagar; Sections 279/338 Indian Penal Code 1860; Sections 146/196 Motor Vehicle Act; Section 378(3) CrPC; Section 378(1) CrPC; Metropolitan Magistrate (West) Tis Hazari Courts Delhi; acquittal Order and Judgment dated 21.11.2019; Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna; decision dated 22.04.2025; submissions heard; judgment reserved; digitally signed DHC order downloaded 25/04/2025.

What did the court decide?

Leave to Appeal allowed under Sections 378(3)/378(1) CrPC; criminal appeal to be numbered as CRL.A./2025; submissions heard and judgment reserved. ¶10

State Vs Mamta Sehgal & Ors. — Motor Accident Claims | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.L.P. 43/2021 STATE .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with IO SI Chetan, PS Paschim Vihar West.

¶5

versus MAMTA SEHGAL & ORS ....Respondents Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Upadhyay Advocate for Respondent no.2.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R

¶8

% 22.04.2025 CRL.L.P. 43/2021

¶9

Criminal Leave Petition under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( hereinafter referred to as „Cr.P.C.‟ ) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/State seeking Leave to Appeal in Case FIR No. 203/2016 under Section 279/338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 146/196 of the Motor Vehicle Act, registered at Police Station Mianwali Nagar, New Delhi.

¶10

For the reasons stated in the Application, the Leave to Appeal is allowed.

¶11

CRL.A....................../2025 (to be numbered)

¶12

Criminal Leave Petition under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the Appellant, against the impugned Order and Judgment dated 21.11.2019, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi acquitting the

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2025 at 17:18:58

¶14

Respondent/Accused in Case FIR No. 203/2016 under Section 279/338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 146/196 of the Motor Vehicle Act, registered at Police Station Mianwali Nagar, New Delhi.

¶15

Submissions heard.

¶16

Judgment reserved.

¶17

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶18

APRIL 22, 2025/RS

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2025 at 17:18:58

State v. Mamta Sehgal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State v. Mamta Sehgal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Habib Ur Rehman Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ms. Poonam Chopra Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Firoz Khan through Parokar Vs the State of N.C.T of Delhi through S.H.O. P.S Shakarpur

Rajveer@ Wazeer Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Moolchand Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Manoj Sirohi Vs State through SHO P.S Bawana