Wasim Ahmed @ Rihan Khan Vs the State Gnctd & Anr.

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 4139/2025

¶4

WASIM AHMED @ RIHAN KHAN .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Saif Ali, Adv. along with petitioner in person through VC.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE GNCTD & ANR. .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State. Mr. Umashankar Panda, Adv. For R-2. along with R-2 in person through VC. SI Suresh Chand, PS Connaught Place.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 01.07.2025

¶13

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶14

CRL.M.A. 18120/2025 (exemption)

¶15

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

¶16

CRL.M.C. 4139/2025

¶17

The present petition under section 528 of the BNSS has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 170/2014, under Sections 354A/354D of the IPC and Section 66A and 67 of the IT Act, 2000, registered as P.S. Connaught Place and all the other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom including the chargesheet pending before the Court of Ms. Kavita Bhist, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the latter has since

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 17:36:42

¶21

compromised with respondent no. 2. Therefore, the present petition seeking quashing of the aforesaid FIR along with all the other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom has been preferred.

¶22

Petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before the Court through video conferencing and have been duly identified by their respective counsels, as well as the Investigating Officer, SI Suresh Chand, PS Connaught Place. 6. The Complainant/respondent No.2 states that the matter has been settled with the petitioner and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed against the petitioner.

¶23

Learned APP for the State submits that investigation in the present FIR has been completed and the chargesheet has been filed is pending before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶24

In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

¶25

“61. ... In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceeding.”

¶26

In view of the aforesaid circumstances, and that fact that the parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 170/2014, under Sections 354A/354D of the IPC and Section 66A and 67 of the IT Act, 2000, registered as P.S.

¶27

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 17:36:42

¶28

Connaught Place and all the other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom including the chargesheet pending before the Court of Ms. Kavita Bhist, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

¶29

In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 170/2014, under Sections 354A/354D of the IPC and Section 66A and 67 of the IT Act, 2000, registered as P.S. Connaught Place and all the other consequential proceedings emanating therefrom including the chargesheet pending before the Court of Ms. Kavita Bhist, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, is hereby quashed subject to cost of Rs. 15,000 to be deposited by the petitioner with DHCBA Employees Welfare Fund (S.B. A/C no. 15530100010657, IFSC- UCBA0001553) within 10 days.

¶30

Petition is disposed of.

¶31

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶32

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶33

JULY 1, 2025/ kr Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 17:36:42

Wasim Ahmed @ Rihan Khan v. the State Gnctd & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wasim Ahmed @ Rihan Khan v. the State Gnctd & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Habiob Bedru Omer Vs Customs

D @ D Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Karan Kumar Vs State & Anr.

Akash Alias Lara Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Arshad Mustafa Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

M/S Alka Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs State of NCT Delhi & Anr.