Jatinder Mohan Singh v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Aug 2025CRL.M.C./4107/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court criminal miscellaneous (CRL.M.C.) order dated 13.08.2025 by Justice Sanjeev Narula disposing of two quashing petitions (CRL.M.C. 4107/2019 - Jatinder Mohan Singh; CRL.M.C. 5824/2019 - Hari Kishan & Anr.) for non-prosecution due to persistent petitioner non-appearance; relates to FIR No. 122/2015 registered at EOW Delhi; repayment of entire disputed amount to Complainant and Complainant's no objection to quashing previously noted; Petitioners named in Column No. 12 of chargesheet with no cognizance taken; no statutory provisions or precedents cited; no relief granted.

What did the court decide?

Considering the repeated non-appearance on behalf of the Petitioners across successive listing dates, it is evident that they have lost interest in pursuing the present petitions. ¶¶17

Jatinder Mohan Singh Vs State & Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~24 & 25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 4107/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33944/2019

¶4

JATINDER MOHAN SINGH .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: None. versus

¶6

STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State.

¶7

- CRL.M.C. 5824/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40507/2019

¶8

HARI KISHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None. versus

¶9

STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶11

O R D E R % 13.08.2025

¶12

This Court on 14^th August, 2024, had noted that the entire amount in dispute had been re-paid to the Complainant. At that stage, the Complainant stated that he had no objection to the quashing of the impugned FIR No. 122/2015 registered at EOW Delhi. The proceedings were, however, adjourned to enable the parties to place the necessary documents on record.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 14:00:13

¶15

Since then, there has been no appearance on behalf of the Petitioners, as noted in orders dated 2^nd September, 2024, 29^th November, 2024 and 26^th March, 2025. The position remains the same even today.

¶16

Mr. Vijay Vikram Singh, APP for State, has pointed out that the names of the Petitioners were mentioned in Column No. 12 of the chargesheet and the Court has not taken cognizance against them.

¶17

In the above circumstances, and considering the non-appearance on behalf of the Petitioners, it is evident that they have lost interest in pursuing the present petitions.

¶18

Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of for non-prosecution along with pending applications.

¶19

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶20

AUGUST 13, 2025 as

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 14:00:13

Jatinder Mohan Singh v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatinder Mohan Singh v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Radhika Steel Enterprises Vs State & Anr.

Jai Ram Pal Vs State, NCT of Delhi

Kuldeep Kumar @ Monu Vs State NCT of Delhi

Surrinderjit Kaur Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ravijot Singh Matta and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Amit Rajput Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi