Petitioner sought leave to appeal against acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, then withdrew the application with liberty to file afresh before the Court of Sessions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate. versus DINESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 04.08.2025
CRL.M.A. 22491/2025 (exemption)
CRL.M.A. 22490/2025 (delay in filing ( 61 days )
CRL.L.P. 402/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/08/2025 at 12:04:38
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
AUGUST 4, 2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/08/2025 at 12:04:38
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Celestium Financial vs A. Gnanasekaran etc.Relied on¶4
2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Girish Kathpalia
Parties & counsel
