Disposed

Kishan Chauhan v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC10 Mar 2025W.P.(CRL)/4016/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus petition seeking production of petitioner's sister missing since October 2024. Status reports showed she had left home voluntarily, married Respondent No. 5, and filed her own protection petition in Allahabad High Court. She appeared before Court confirming she wished to live with her husband; petition disposed of as she is a major acting on her own volition.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; petition disposed of since the girl is a major living with her husband on her own volition.

Kishan Chauhan Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~12

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 4016/2024 KISHAN CHAUHAN .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Moin Akhtar, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) along with Ms. Priyam Agarwal & Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advs. with Insp. Manoj, SI Suresh Kumar Meena & ASI Ram Mehar, PS Usman Pur.

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 10.03.2025

¶10

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶11

The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the PetitionerKishan Chauhan under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the BNSS seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for the production of his sister, aged about 19 years, who is stated to be missing since 3rd October, 2024.

¶12

As per the Petitioner, his sister had been abducted by Respondent No. 5 and his associates on 3rd October, 2024. Accordingly, the Petitioner filed a complaint and an FIR No. 0546/2024 was registered under Sections 140(3)/3(5) of the BNS at PS New Usmanpur, Delhi.

¶13

The matter was first taken up on 23^rd December, 2024. On the said date, the Court was informed that on 9th October, 2024, a letter had been received by the DCP North-East, Delhi, purportedly hand-written by the missing girl,

¶14

W.P.(CRL) 4016/2024

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2025 at 11:23:12

¶17

stating that she had left her home on her own wishes as her parents were forcing her to marry someone against her will.

¶18

On the last date of hearing i.e. 18^th February, 2025 a status report dated dated 14th February, 2025 was placed on record. As per the said report, the missing girl had filed a writ petition being Writ - C No. 36908/2024 in the Allahabad High Court seeking protection from the said High Court, apprehending threat to her life in view of the marriage against the wishes of the parents. Additionally, on the said date, it was stated that the police are in the process of tracing the missing girl, through this information.

¶19

On the last date of hearing, the Court upon learning about the petition filed before the Allahabad High Court, issued the following directions:

¶20

“4. While the Delhi Police is also further investigating this matter, the Petitioner is free to appear before the Allahabad High Court in the said writ petition and obtain further information which may be available. 5. Let the advocates representing the missing girl in the said case before the Allahabad High Court i.e., Mr. Abhishek Tripathi (A/A1252/2023) and Mr. Ankit Mishra (A/A0593/2021), be also enquired from in order to trace the missing girl.”

¶21

Today, a status report dated 10^th March 2025 has been filed by the Delhi Police under the signatures of Insp. Ramesh Kalsan, P.S. New Usmanpur, Delhi. A perusal of the status report reveals that a letter has been received from the missing Girl on 14th February, 2025 at PS New Usmanpur, Delhi, along with a marriage certificate substantiating the marriage between the missing girl and Respondent No. 5, Munish.

¶22

The concerned Investigating Officer (‘IO’) is also stated to have spoken to the missing girl on call wherein she intimated the IO about the said

¶23

W.P.(CRL) 4016/2024

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

¶26

marriage. The relevant portions of the status report are set out below:

¶27

“2. It is further submitted that sincere efforts have made to trace the victim girl Sonia @ Sweta Aged: About 18 Years 10 Months, during investigation it came to know that the above mentioned girl Sonia @ Sweta got married with Munish S/o Gyan Singh R/o C-44/225 Gali No.15 Sudamapuri Gamri Delhi, on 13.02.2025 at ARYA SAMAJ VEDIC VIVAH MANDAL (REGD.), B-229, New Sanjay Amar Colony, Near Dr. Hedgewar Hospital, Vishwash Nagar, Shahdara Delhi-32 (copy of certified marriage certificate and other documents annexed here with.).

¶28

3. That on 14.02.2025, intimation of marriage and one hand written application of Sonia @ Sweta received at PS New Usmanpur, Delhi (copy of intimation, marriage certificate and copy of registered envelope annexed here with.)

¶29

4. On 28.02.2025, IO has called on mobile 8368991876 then he talked with victim girl Sonia @ Sweta, during conversation she told that she got married with Munish S/o Gyan Singh R/ C-44/225 Gali No.15 Sudamapuri Gamri Delhi, on 13.02.2025 at ARYA SAMAJ VEDIC VIVAH MANDAL (REGD.), B-229, New Sanjay Amar Colony, Near Dr. Hedgewar Hospital, Vishwash Nagar, Shahdara Delhi-32. She further told she has also intimated to her sister Sheetal on her whatsapp number. Sincere efforts has made to recover the girl but could not be recovered. She assured that she will come on NDOH i.e.10.03.2025 before the Hon'ble Court of Delhi.”

¶30

The couple i.e. the missing girl and the Respondent No. 5 have appeared before the Court virtually. The Respondent No. 5 logged in on virtual proceedings under the name of ‘Monu Pal’. He submits that the name Monu Pal is his own name and his email address is [email protected].

¶31

W.P.(CRL) 4016/2024

¶32

Page 3 of 4

¶33

¶34

It is further submitted that the girl is a major. The girl and the boy informed the Court that their date of birth is 7th December, 2005 and 1st November, 2004 respectively.

¶35

Upon being queried as to where she got married to the Resp. No. 5, the girl submits that she got married near Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. The name of the lawyer accompanying them during the marriage is one Mr. Pawan. The certificate of marriage has also been filed along with the status report.

¶36

The Girl submits that she wishes to live with her husband- the Respondent No.5.

¶37

Accordingly, no further orders are called for in this petition as the girl is a major and she has got married and is living with her husband on her own volition.

¶38

The petition is disposed of in these terms. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

¶39

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J

¶40

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

¶41

MARCH 10, 2025

¶42

Rahul/rks

¶43

W.P.(CRL) 4016/2024

¶44

Page 4 of 4

¶45

Kishan Chauhan v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishan Chauhan v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramanjeet Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Raushan Khatoon & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Harpal Singh Vs St Ate of NCT of Delhi

K W/O P Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Virender Kumar @ Mintu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Pradeep Rai Vs Union of India & Ors.

Karamjit Garg Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jamahir @ Jawahar Paswan Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Rahul Vattamparambil Remesh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ganga Kumari Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Bhagwan Das Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Amirhossein Alizadeh Vs the Commissioner of Customs & Ors.

Akash Malik Vs Commissioner of Customs New Delhi

Amal Krishna Vs Union of India & Ors.