Petition against a provident fund inspector's proceedings was dismissed because petitioner no. 1, the establishment concerned, had shut down and ceased to exist, and the remaining petitioners never sought substitution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
JAGAT CINEMA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: None.
versus
PROVIDENT FUND INSPECTOR .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 18.11.2025
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2025 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2025 at 12:12:34
Jagat Cinema & Ors.
Provident Fund Inspector
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
