Petitioner challenged jail authorities' rejection of furlough; the same order was already under challenge in a connected writ petition, so this petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 03.02.2025
At the outset, it transpires that the same order dated 08.01.2025 passed by the jail authorities rejecting the petitioner’s prayer for furlough has been challenged vide W.P.(CRL) No. 339/2025, in which notice has been issued by this court on 30.01.2025, returnable for 05.03.2025.
Evidently, the present petition has come to be filed by some error. Accordingly, the petition is disposed-of as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
FEBRUARY 3, 2025 V.Rawat
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 15:18:27
RAKESH
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
