Dismissed

Yogesh Kataria v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Jul 2025CRL.L.P./367/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Complainant sought leave under Section 419(4) BNSS to appeal against acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 NI Act case. Relying on Celestium Financial v. Gnanasekaran, the High Court held a complainant has a statutory right of appeal under Section 413 BNSS and need not seek leave. Petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appeal before the Sessions Court.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the Sessions Court against the acquittal.

Yogesh Kataria Vs State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~69

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.L.P. 367/2025 & CRL.M.A. 20188/2025

¶4

YOGESH KATARIA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Anish Shresiha and Mr. Firoz Khan, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State. SI Parveen Kumar, P.S. Malviya Nagar.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶10

The present application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023¹ [formerly Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973² ], seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 26th March, 2025, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act), Saket Courts, New Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 3579/2017 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, whereby Respondent No. 2 was acquitted. The Appellant was the Complainant in the said case.

¶11

The Supreme Court, in the recent judgement of Celestium Financial v. Gnanasekaran³ has held that the complainant is indeed a “victim” within

¶12

1 “BNSS”

¶13

2 “Cr.P.C.”

¶14

3 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 11:48:27

¶17

the meaning of Section 2(wa) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,⁴ in cases of dishonour of cheque.

¶18

In light of the above judgment, since the Appellant has a statutory right of appeal under Section 413 of BNSS (formerly Section 372 of Cr.P.C.) and is not required to seek leave under Section 419 of BNSS, the appropriate remedy would be to file an appeal before the Sessions Court.

¶19

In light of the above, counsel for Appellant, states that he would like to withdraw the present petition and seeks liberty to file an appeal before the Sessions Court against the order of acquittal.

¶20

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶21

As and when such an appeal is filed, the same shall be adjudicated on its own merits in accordance with law.

¶22

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶23

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶24

JULY 16, 2025 as

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 11:48:27

Yogesh Kataria v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Kataria v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Directorate of Enfocement Vs Lalita Mishra

Preeti Saharawat(in Jc) Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Hammad Ahmed Vs Hamdard Wakf Laboratories & Anr.

Dr. Umashankar Anbarasan Vs CBI

Gajendra Pal Singh Vs State

Swati Saxena Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)