Dismissed¶18

Sunder v. State of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC3 Nov 2025W.P.(CRL)/3579/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus; Article 226 Constitution of India; s. 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023; W.P.(CRL) 3579/2025; Sunder v. State of Delhi & Anr.; daughter recovered; Police Station Vikas Puri; voluntary marriage; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Delhi High Court; 03.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

As the petitioner, following recovery of his daughter, chose not to press the writ petition further, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without adjudicating the habeas corpus claim. ¶18

Sunder Vs State of Delhi & Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 3579/2025

¶4

SUNDER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sharun Daniel, Mr. Hardayal Singh and Mr. Rohit Nain, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, St. Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Advs. for State. SI Devender Yadav and HC Ravi, PS Vikaspuri.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶8

O R D E R % 03.11.2025

¶9

The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 seeking issuance of writ/order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus, thereby seeking direction to Respondent No. 1 to produce daughter of petitioner before this Court.

¶10

Issue notice.

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel accepts notice.

¶12

Status Report has been submitted during the course of proceeding and the same is taken on record.

¶13

Learned Standing Counsel submits that the daughter of the petitioner

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 13:32:07

¶16

has been recovered and that on 30.10.2025, she appeared at Police Station Vikas Puri along with her mother-in-law. The daughter of petitioner, who is major, has reportedly voluntarily married her one friend Vinod and is happily living with her husband and in-laws.

¶17

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in view of aforesaid, the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition, anymore.

¶18

In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶19

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J

¶20

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶21

NOVEMBER 3, 2025 /r/pk/nc

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 13:32:07

Sunder v. State of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunder v. State of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taruna Vs State through SHO Ps Jahangir Puri & Ors.

Alamgir Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Mohd Nasim & Ors. Vs the State NCT Delhi & Ors.

Raj Basant Das Vs State

Ramanjeet Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Mohd Asim & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kunal Sudan & Anr. Vs State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Sharmake Mohamed Hussein Vs the Union of India & Ors.

Taruna Vs State through SHO Ps Jahangir Puri & Ors.

State Vs Parvesh Rana & Anr.

State Vs Mukesh Joshi

Rupinder Gill Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ruksana & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.