Petition challenging a summoning order in a cheque dishonour case was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner took no steps to serve the unserved respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
VIVEK TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chirag Kumar, Advocate
Versus
M/S IRIS COMPUTORS LTD. .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
%
13.02.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2025
r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 12:03:15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivek Tyagi
M/s Iris Computors Ltd.
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
