Ameen v. the State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash FIR for offences under Sections 323/354(B)/506/509 IPC following settlement between parties. Court recorded genuine compromise, noted Gian Singh, and quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings.
What the court decided
$~79
- I� THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT �EW DELHI
- % Date of decision: 2 2.05.2025
- CRL.M.C. 3352/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14758/2025 DELAY 13 DAYS IN RE-FILING OF PETITION
AMEEN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohd Imran, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
THE STATE AND ANR. …Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Urvashi, P.S.Sonia Vihar. Mr. Sikander, Advocate for R-2 along with Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM:HO�'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI�DER DUDEJA JUDGME�T(ORAL)
RAVI�DER DUDEJA, J.
- This petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks quashing of FIR NO. 293/2023 Under Sections 323/354(B)/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code registered at P.S. Sonia Vihar, and all proceedings arising therefrom pursuant to a settlement between the parties.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 293/2023 and proceedings should be quashed on the basis of a settlement between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ameen
- respondent
The State
- respondent
Respondent No. 2 (complainant)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court