The High Court of Delhi disposed of a State petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent, ruling that the petition inquired was infructuous due to a prior dismissal of the same application by the father of the victim.
None; the petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
STATE .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Mohit, PS Alipur.
versus
CHANAKYA MANN @ SANJU .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Lahana Singh Saini and Mr. Vishwajeet Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 19.03.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 19, 2025/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:42:06
2 provisions across 1 enactments
State
Chanakya Mann @ Sanju
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
