Petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC was withdrawn by counsel since charges were yet to be framed and contentions would be raised before the trial court via a bail application. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar and Mr. Vikas Singh, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with ASI Rajbir Singh, PS Aman Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 05.05.2025
CRL.M.A. 13609/2025(Exemption)
CRL.M.C. 3068/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2025 at 16:01:02
permission to withdraw the present petition by submitting that the charges are yet to be framed and the contentions, as raised in this petition, shall be addressed before the learned Trial Court by moving a bail application.
SHALINDER KAUR, J
MAY 5, 2025 /ss/sk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2025 at 16:01:02
This is a digitally signed order.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramji Lal & Ors.
State of NCT of Delhi
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
