Remanded

Indian Phytopathological Society v. Vaibhav Kumar Singh

Delhi HC2 May 2025CRL.M.C./3063/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court set aside an order issued without examining witnesses under Section 223 BNSS. The court remanded the matter to the Trial Court to record statements before issuing summons or taking cognizance, relying on Karnataka and Kerala High Court precedents.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 28.10.2024 set aside; matter remanded to Trial Court to examine complainant and witnesses under Section 223 BNSS before issuing notice/summons.

Indian Phytopathological Society Vs Vaibhav Kumar Singh — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~70 & 71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 3062/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13575/2025 (Stay)

¶4

DR. DILIP KUMAR GHOSH .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. T.N. Singh, Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh and Mr. Sham Chand, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

DR. VAIBHAV KUMAR SINGH .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.

¶8

¶9

- CRL.M.C. 3063/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13577/2025 (Stay)

¶10

INDIAN PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOCIETY .....Petitioner

¶11

Through: Mr. T.N. Singh, Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh and Mr. Sham Chand, Advs.

¶12

versus

¶13

VAIBHAV KUMAR SINGH .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM:

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶15

O R D E R % 02.05.2025 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶16

CRL.M.A. 13576/2025 (Exemption) in CRL.M.C. 3062/2025 AND CRL.M.A. 13578/2025 (Exemption) in CRL.M.C. 3063/2025

¶17

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of accordingly.

¶18

CRL.M.C. 3062/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13575/2025 (Stay) AND CRL.M.C. 3063/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13577/2025 (Stay)

¶19

The present petitions under Section 528 of the BNSS (Section 482 of

¶20

the Cr.P.C.) seeks the following prayers:

¶21

“i) Allow the petition of the petitioners filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 of BNSS, 2023;

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2025 at 15:16:14

¶24

ii) Quash or set-aside the impugned order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class-04, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CC No.41486 of 2024;

¶25

iii) Remit the matter back to the Judicial Magistrate First Class-04, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi to make the exercise afresh under Section 223 BNSS, 2023 by following the procedure in the light of decisions of the Hon’ble High Courts of Karnataka and Kerala;”

¶26

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that vide impugned order dated 28.10.2024, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate issued summons to the petitioners even before recording the statements of the complainant and the witnesses as provided in Section 223 (1) of the BNSS. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka (at Bengaluru) in CRL. PETITION NO. 7526/2024 dated 27.09.2024, titled as ‘ Sri Basanagouda R. Patil (Yatnal) vs. Sri Shivananda S. Patil ’ on particular paragraph nos. 10 and 11, which reads as under:

¶27

“10. Therefore, the procedural drill would be this way:

¶28

A complaint is presented before the Magistrate under Section 223 of the BNSS; on presentation of the complaint, it would be the duty of the Magistrate / concerned Court to examine the complainant on oath, which would be his sworn statement and examine the witnesses present if any, and the substance of such examination should be reduced into writing. The question of taking of cognizance would not arise at this juncture. The magistrate has to, in terms of the proviso, issue a notice to the accused who is given an opportunity of being heard. Therefore, notice shall be issued to the accused at that stage and after hearing the accused, take cognizance and regulate its procedure thereafter.

¶29

The proviso indicates that an accused should have an opportunity of being heard. Opportunity of being heard would not mean an empty formality. Therefore, the notice that is sent to the accused in terms of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 223 of the BNSS shall append to it the complaint; the sworn statement; statement of witnesses if any, for the accused to appear and submit his case before taking of cognizance. In the considered view of this Court, it is the clear purport of Section 223 of BNSS 2023.”

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2025 at 15:16:14

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

In the present case, the perusal of the impugned order dated 28.10.2024 reflects that without examining the complainant or the witnesses, notice has been issued to the petitioner.

¶33

Learned counsel appears on advance notice on behalf of the respondent and submits that he has no objection if the matter is remanded back to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for following the procedure as provided under Section 223(1) of the BNSS for examination of the complainant and the witnesses and for hearing the petitioners before taking cognizance and issuing notice to the latter.

¶34

In view of the same, the impugned order dated 28.10.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned Trial Court to follow the procedure as envisaged under Section 223 of the BNSS for examining the complainant and the witnesses and thereafter, giving an opportunity to the petitioners for hearing before taking cognizance and summoning them, in accordance with law.

¶35

In view of the above, the present petitions are allowed and disposed of accordingly.

¶36

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶37

Order be communicated to the learned Trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

¶38

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.

¶39

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶40

MAY 2, 2025/ kr/Pc Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶41

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2025 at 15:16:14

¶42

This is a digitally signed order.

Indian Phytopathological Society v. Vaibhav Kumar Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indian Phytopathological Society v. Vaibhav Kumar Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baldev Singh Dhillon Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rk Seb Vs State of NCT Delhi

Sachin Awana & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shiv Kumar Yadav Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Jagdish Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Gaurav @ Sunny Vs State NCT of Delhi