Petitioner informed the High Court that he had been acquitted by the Trial Court. The petition was disposed of as no further orders were called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
DEEPAK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay, Adv. (DHCLSC), Ms. Muskan Aggarwal and Ms. Gauri Pandit, Advs. along with petitioner
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Ashish Mahani, Adv. SI Babulal, PS Burari
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R % 04.12.2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been acquitted in the present case by the learned Trial Court vide judgment dated 20.09.2025, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Mahila Court03), Central District, Tis Hazari Court.
2. A copy of the said judgment has been handed over by learned counsel for the petitioner today in the Court.
3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further orders are called for.
4. The present petition along with pending application(s), if any, is disposed of.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
DECEMBER 4, 2025 /ar/ yr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 11:43:50
Deepak Kumar
State of NCT of Delhi
Ajay Digpaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
