Petitioner sought writ under Article 226 read with Section 528 BNSS for FIR registration and disciplinary action against police staff. Petition withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Sr. Adv, with Mr. Utkarsh Bhargava, Mr. Navin Chaudhry, Mr. Vipin Chauhan, Advs.
versus
STATE N.CT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma, Adv. with SI Rakesh, PS Sangam Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 10.09.2025
W.P.(CRL) 2886/2025
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/lks/na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 14:22:40
X & ORS.
STATE N.CT OF DELHI AND ANR
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
