Petitioner sought leave to appeal against acquittal of the accused under Sections 341/506 IPC by the Metropolitan Magistrate. Leave to appeal was allowed and the petition disposed of; arguments in the resulting appeal were heard and judgment reserved.
Leave to appeal allowed; petition converted to appeal, arguments heard and judgment reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
CAPT. RAM KUMAR (RETD). .....Petitioner
RAJESH HUDA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satyavan Kudalwal, Advocate for Respondent No.1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 16.04.2025
CRL.L.P. 270/2019
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 02:37:47
CRL.A.----- (TO BE NUMBERED BY THE REGISTRY)
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 16, 202
r
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 02:37:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the acquittal of Respondent No.1 under Sections 341/506 IPC?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Capt. Ram Kumar (Retd.)
Rajesh Huda
Anr.
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
