5.4. He states that Respondent no. 2, thereafter, again lodged an FIR bearing No. 324 of 2015 on 13.02.2015 under section 498/406/34 of IPC at PS Shakarpur, Delhi against the Petitioner No.1, Petitioner No.2 (Jija of Petitioner No.1) herein, her mother-in-law and sister-in-law (wife of Petitioner No.2), which stands quashed by this Court in a separate proceeding. 5.5. He states that perusal of the subject FIR firstly, shows that the alleged incident narrated in the FIR is without any date and time, secondly after the registration of the complaint, the complainant/Respondent no. 2 has not submitted her clothes for investigation. Thirdly, there is there no internal injury found in the medical examination. Fourthly, Respondent no. 2 has failed to inform the date of incident during the medical examination. Fifthly, the offence under Section 328 of IPC has been dropped in the charge order due to allegations being devoid of any scientific/medical proof. Sixthly, since past 10 years the alleged video and photographs referred to in the FIR have not been placed on record. And lastly, since the trial is still at the initial stage and no witness has been examined till date and Respondent no. 2 has withdrawn the allegations the trial is unlikely to yield any result. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid, if the Petitioners were to be prosecuted further in the matter it is unlikely that the present FIR will result in a conviction since there would be no evidence which could prove the said allegations levelled by Respondent no. 2 against the said Petitioners.
