Allowed

Rahul Sehgal and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC17 Oct 2025W.P.(CRL)/2654/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi allowed a petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashing FIR No. 202/2024 for offences under IPC due to a settlement between the parties. Proceedings arising therefrom and pending applications were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 202/2024 and all proceedings arising therefrom were quashed; pending applications stood disposed of.

Rahul Sehgal and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~27

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2654/2025& CRL.M.A. 25076/2025 EXMP.

¶4

RAHUL SEHGAL AND ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Indresh Upadhyay, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State with SI Ramniwas, P.S. Uttam Nagar with complainant and her husband.

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN O R D E R

¶10

% 17.10.2025

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023/ 482 Cr.P.C., 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.202/2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 323/342/354/506/509/34 IPC, 1860 lodged at Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi along with all the proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

¶13

The petitioners are present in Court and so is IO of the case. The petitioners have been identified by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as by the IO of the case.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have settled their disputes amicably by way of Memorandum of Understanding dated 08.05.2025.

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2025 at 12:20:53

¶18

Learned APP for the State submits that he has no objection if the quashing petition is allowed and the FIR is quashed on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. On a Court query, the complainant/petitioner no.2 submits that since the petitioners in “CRL. M.C. 7485/2025 titled Girish Grover vs. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.” are her neighbours, she has compromised the matter with them without any force, pressure or any undue influence. Petitioner no. 4 corroborates the statement made by the petitioner no. 2/complainant.

¶19

In view of the compromise between the parties, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 202/2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 323/342/354/506/509/ 34 IPC lodged at Police Station Uttam Nagar along with all the proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶20

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶21

SHAIL JAIN, J.

¶22

OCTOBER 17, 2025 acm

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2025 at 12:20:53

Rahul Sehgal and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Sehgal and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gulfam & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Akshay Dhingra Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sonu @ Hemraj Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Rahul Dev Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Sandeep Kumar Vs State (Nct of Delhi ) &Ors.

Sandeep Vs the State & Anr.

Kenneth Chidi Onyeaghala Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Vishant Ruhil & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sh Sanjay Kumar and Others

Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Binny K R & Ors.

Amar Singh Vs Chand Miyan & Anr. (the National Insurance Co. Ltd)

Mohd Fahad Vs the State NCT of Delhi

M/S Cottex Dyeing Vs Rajesh Singh & Anr.

M/S Taj Sats Air Catering Ltd. Vs Ram Phool