Writ petition sought disclosure of a police inquiry report, disciplinary and criminal action, and compensation for alleged custodial torture. The court found the inquiry thorough, concluded no culpability was established, declined further directions, but left petitioners free to pursue remedies. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2025 at 11:42:50
Inquiry Officer/ ACP-PG Cell;
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 11, 2025 as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2025 at 11:42:50
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further directions were warranted on the inquiry report into allegations of custodial torture by Delhi Police.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Basant Goel
State of NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
