Petition seeking quashing of an FIR based on an alleged compromise was dismissed for want of appearance by the petitioner and respondents across multiple dates, with liberty to re-apply if a genuine compromise exists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SANDEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR ......Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State along with SI Ashok Singh, PS Nihal Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 03.12.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/12/2025 at 11:21:00
does not imply that the merits will not be examined upon re-filing.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 3, 2025/MK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/12/2025 at 11:21:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition premised on an alleged compromise could be pursued when neither party appeared before the court.
Sandeep Kumar
The State of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
