Petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 641/2022 (PS Tilak Nagar) for offences under Section 323 IPC, Section 12 POCSO Act and Section 75 JJ Act. After the State showed a video recording of allegations, petitioner withdrew the petition to face trial; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
KRISHAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdish Singh, Advocate
versus
THE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State with IO/SI Sunil, PS Tilak Nagar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 20.08.2025
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2025 at 12:46:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 641/2022 under Sections 323 IPC, 12 POCSO and 75 JJ Act could be quashed on merits.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Krishan Kumar
The State Govt NCT of Delhi
Anr
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
