Allowed

Mayank Sondhi & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC7 Jul 2025CRL.M.C./2519/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi quashed an FIR and consequential proceedings under IPC Sections 498A, 406, and 34 in a matrimonial dispute. The petitioners established a valid mediation settlement and divorce decree, demonstrating irretrievable breakdown and mutual resolution without coercion.

What did the court decide?

The subject FIR No. 0534/2021 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Mayank Sondhi & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~50

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 07.07.2025

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2519/2025

¶4

MAYANK SONDHI & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

versus

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.

¶11

CORAM:

¶12

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR SHALINDER KAUR, J (ORAL)

¶13

CRL.M.A. 11284/2025, CRL.M.A. 11285/2025 (Exemption)

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

Applications stand disposed of.

¶16

CRL.M.C. 2519/2025, CRL.M.A. 11286/2025

¶17

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR bearing No. 0534/2021 dated 28.06.2021 for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, West, Delhi, (“subject FIR”) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner

¶19

Signature Not Verified

¶20

Page 1 of 5

¶21

Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 2519/2025 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 8.07.2025 14:43:46

¶22

no. 1, petitioner no. 2 and petitioner no. 3 are the husband, father-inlaw and mother-in-law, respectively, of the respondent no. 2. The marriage between the petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 12.04.2016, in accordance with the Sikh rites and ceremonies and a male child, namely, Kartik was born out of the said wedlock. He submits that due to the irreconcilable and temperamental differences, the marriage of the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no. 2 has suffered an irretrievable breakdown and the parties have been living separately since 22.12.2020.

¶23

The learned counsel submits that the incompatible behaviour, conduct and temperament of the parties, coupled with raising demands of dowry and increasing harassment, led to registration of the subject FIR and filing of litigation by the respondent no. 2. 6. He further submits that during the pendency of litigation between the parties, the parties were referred to the Mediation Centre, Dwarka, Courts, New Delhi, wherein, after mutual discussions, the parties had voluntarily, peacefully and amicably settled their disputes without any coercion, pressure, undue influence force, misrepresentation or mistake, vide Mediation Settlement dated 19.09.2024 and that no further dispute subsists in relation thereto. Moreover, the divorce by way of mutual consent has also taken place between the parties vide the divorce decree dated 31.01.2025 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and no appeal is stated to have been filed from

¶24

Signature Not Verified

¶25

Page 2 of 5

¶26

Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 2519/2025 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 8.07.2025 14:43:46

¶27

the said divorce decree.

¶28

The present petition is premised on the aforesaid assertion that the dispute inter se the parties stand amicably resolved, of their own volition, uninfluenced by any coercion, compulsion or undue inducement. In furtherance thereof, a Mediation Settlement Deed dated 19.09.2024 has been duly executed between the petitioner no. 1 and the respondent No. 2. It is further submitted that, in terms of the said Mediation Settlement Deed, the respondent No. 2 has undertaken to withdraw all proceedings presently pending before various judicial fora.

¶29

As per the terms of Settlement, the petitioner no. 1 has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 31,00,000/- to respondent no. 2, as a full and final settlement of all her claims including maintenance (past, present and future), permanent alimony, stridhan and all other miscellaneous expenses. It was further agreed that the minor male child shall remain in the care and custody of the mother/respondent no. 2, however, the father shall have the visitation rights of the minor child, subject to prior intimation to the respondent no. 2, at a mutually agreed place. The said Mediation Settlement Deed dated 19.09.2024 outlining the terms of settlement has been placed on record.

¶30

Pursuant to this Settlement, the Statement of the parties have been recorded by the Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 16.04.2025 and they have been duly identified by the Investigating Officer and their respective counsels. The respondent no. 2, in her statement before the

¶31

Signature Not Verified

¶32

Page 3 of 5

¶33

Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 2519/2025 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 8.07.2025 14:43:46

¶34

Joint Registrar (Judicial), has stated therein, that she has no objection if the subject FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶35

Before this Court, the Investigating Officer has again identified the parties and they have confirmed that they are abiding by all the terms of the Settlement.

¶36

The complainant/respondent no. 2, who is present-in-person before this Court, upon being queried, confirms that the Settlement Deed dated 19.09.2024 has been entered into between the parties and that in full and final settlement of all her claims including maintenance (past, present and future), stridhan , dowry, articles, jewellery, permanent alimony etc. she has received the entire settlement amount of Rs. 31,00,000/- from the petitioner no. 1. She submits that the child shall remain in her care and custody and the petitioner no. 1 shall have visitation rights, subject to prior intimation to her, at a mutually agreed place. The respondent no. 2 also confirms that the marriage has been dissolved vide the decree dated 31.01.2025 and that no litigation stand pending between the parties. Furthermore, she has no objection if the subject FIR and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶37

In view of the foregoing, the learned counsels of the parties, jointly prayed, for quashing of the subject FIR.

¶38

The learned APP, appearing on behalf of the State, submits that there is no objection is the subject FIR and all consequential

¶39

Signature Not Verified

¶40

Page 4 of 5

¶41

Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 2519/2025 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 8.07.2025 14:43:46

¶42

proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶43

In these circumstances, and having regard to the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. : (2014) 6 SCC 466, and in view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes voluntarily and without any coercion, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the criminal proceedings. On the contrary, such continuation is likely to foster further animosity between the parties. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom deserve to be quashed. 15. In conspectus of the above facts and the Mediation Settlement Deed dated 19.09.2024, the subject FIR No. 0534/2021 dated 28.06.2021 for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, West, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, are hereby quashed.

¶44