Petitioner, an accused in a 2017 FIR under Sections 302/201/120-B/34 IPC, sought custody parole to attend his mother's burial. The court granted custody parole for up to six hours excluding travel time, with escort from residence to Qabristan and back to jail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
YASIN @ GILLI
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shivendra Singh, Mr. Manish Kumar and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, Ld. APP for State with SI Kiranpal Singh, P.S. Sabzi Mandi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
CRL.M.C.2516/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 16:32:50
Bail. The Petitioner was granted Interim Bail in 2020, the conditions of which were not flouted and he surrendered on time. Therefore, custody parole is sought for attending the burial.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 12, 2025/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 16:32:50
1 issue framed by the court
Whether custody parole should be granted to an accused to attend his mother's burial.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yasin @ Gilli
The State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
