Madan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal abated upon verified death of appellant during pendency.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 242/2004
MADAN .....Appellant Through: None. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Sunil Singh Rawat, Mr. Siddharth Goyal, Mr. Naresh Kumar Dagar and Mr. Ajay Bhardwaj, Advs. with SI Baham Parkash, P.S. Sultan Puri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
- % 10.11.2025
- This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.
- Status report has been filed by the learned APP for the State.
- As per the said report, the Appellant-Madan has expired on 21st May, 2016, and the factum of his death has also been verified.
- Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of as abated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Madan
- respondent
State
Coram
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court