Petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to raise grounds before the Trial Court. Court allowed withdrawal and clarified merits and contentions remain open.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to approach Trial Court to raise all grounds urged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Through: In person.
versus
SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Piyush Kumar (Sr. Prosecutor) and Mr. Vibhav Singh, Advocates for SFIO. Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC with Mr. Vipul Verma, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 12.02.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:55:11
considered on their own merits, in accordance with law.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2025 nk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:55:11
VINOD KUMAR BINDAL
SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE
AND ANR
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
