Writ petition withdrawn by counsel before any adjudication; petitioner permitted to raise the grounds urged in the petition before the Trial Court at an appropriate stage. Court made no observations on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI .....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Mahavir Jogi, SI, PSBarakhamba Road.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 22.01.2025
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JANUARY 22, 2025 nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:30:25
Devesh Kumar Tripathi
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
