Disposed¶17

Pappu Singh @Raju Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC21 Jul 2025W.P.(CRL)/2238/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pappu Singh @ Raju Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), W.P.(CRL) 2238/2025, Delhi High Court, Arun Monga, J., decided 21.07.2025. Premature release; Sentence Review Board (SRB); remission; writ of mandamus; FIR No. 175/2012; Sections 376/506 IPC; Police Station Chhawla; long incarceration about 13/14 years; petition disposed with direction to consider case in forthcoming SRB meeting and decide either way per law; copy to Jail Superintendent.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent authority of the State to take all appropriate steps to consider the petitioner's case in the forthcoming meeting of the Sentence Review Board (SRB) and take a decision either way, in accordance with law; copy of the order to be sent to the Jail Superintendent concerned for information and compliance. ¶17

Pappu Singh @Raju Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~79

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 2238/2025 PAPPU SINGH @RAJU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Anmol K. Pandey, Advocates.

¶4

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for the State alongwith Insp. Saroj Bala and SI Dharmveer, P.S.-Chhawla

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA O R D E R

¶7

% 21.07.2025

¶8

Petitioner herein seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent and/or the Sentence Review Board (SRB) to consider the petitioner’s case and grant premature release in criminal case arising out of FIR No. 175/2012, under Sections 376/506 IPC, Police Station Chhawla.

¶9

Succinctly, the case set up by the petitioner is as under (relevant paras from petition) :-

¶10

“6. That the petitioner has suffered a lot during his long and continuous incarceration of about thirteen (13) years and with remission about fourteen (14) years. The jail authorities carried out some formalities last year in regards to forwarding the name of the petitioner for the Sentence Review Board (SRB) but seemingly, the same was not considered for the reasons best known to the respondent. The family of the petitioner consists of his wife and daughter. The petitioner has proven that he is on the path of reformation. The reformative aspect of the Indian Legal System may kindly be considered at the time of deciding the plea of the petitioner. The petitioner hails from the poorest segment of society.

¶11

W.P.(CRL) 2238/2025 Page 1 of 2

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2025 at 13:30:23

¶14

7. That the family of the petitioner is in a completely dilapidated state due to his incarceration as there is no one to take care of the family of petitioner since he is the sole bread winner of his family.

¶15

8. That the petitioner has consistently shown good conduct during his incarceration. The name of the petitioner was sent once and it was rejected however, it was not sent again to the Sentence Review Board despite passage of time.”

¶16

Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned ASC (Crl), appears for respondent/state on advance service. He submits that whenever the next meeting of the Sentence Review Board (SRB) is convened, the petitioner’s case shall be considered by the Board.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid candid statement, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction that all appropriate steps shall be taken by the competent authority of the State to consider the case of the petitioner in the forthcoming meeting Sentence Review Board (SRB) and take a decision either way, in accordance with law.

¶18

Let the copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent concerned for information and compliance.

¶19

ARUN MONGA, J

¶20

JULY 21, 2025/ dy

¶21

W.P.(CRL) 2238/2025 Page 2 of 2

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2025 at 13:30:23

Pappu Singh @Raju Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Singh @Raju Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Kapoor Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Rajiv Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Raquib Alam Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dil Khush Bairwa Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Manish Manchanda & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mala & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

M/S C Sec Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Deepak Kumar @Deepak and Oths Vs the State and Anr.

Renu Bibi Vs State NCT of Delhi

Ravi @ Ravinath Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Karan Nakwal@ Karan and Ors. Vs State of Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.